(Reuters – Doug Palmer)
A group of U.S. senators urged President Barack Obama on Monday to back legislation requiring the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement and a long list of other trade pacts they blame for millions of lost U.S. manufacturing jobs.
“We want trade and plenty of it, but we want trade under new rules. The TRADE Act will help Congress and the White House craft a trade policy that makes sense and learns from our many mistakes over the past couple of decades,” Senator Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, told reporters in a conference call.
The bill, which has seven co-sponsors in the Senate, shows the strong opposition Obama could face from many members of his own Democratic Party if he pushes for new trade agreements without addressing concerns about past trade pacts. Six Democrats are among the co-sponsors, as well as independent Bernie Sanders. Read more here.
Showing posts with label TRADE Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TRADE Act. Show all posts
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Proposed "Trade Act" Could Lead to Re-opening NAFTA
(GHY International)
A trade reform bill introduced this week would put the brakes on pending trade agreements and could result in re-opening existing pacts such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Led by Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine), chairman of the House Trade Working Group, more than 100 supporters of the legislation claim it sets out a new international trade model that would help protect human rights, the environment and U.S. jobs. The working group has opposed free-trade agreements, including the Central American Free Trade Agreement and the pending pacts.
The proposed legislation would require that pending agreements with Panama, Colombia and South Korea be renegotiated to meet the TRADE Act’s requirements. The bill has the support of several progressive organizations, such as Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, environmental groups and all the major unions, including the AFL-CIO and Change to Win.
“This is the opportunity to build a new model for trade,” said Michaud, noting that a companion bill in the Senate is also in the works.
Business groups and industry lobbyists, however, say the measure would stifle trade and hurt the U.S. economy.
“This is a recipe for disaster,” said Christopher Wenk, trade lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “These guys want to set a course backward on trade, and we want to set a course forward on trade. This is not the course our workers and exporters need right now.”
Andrew Shore, a partner with the trade law and lobbying firm Jochum Shore & Trossevin, which represents retailers and importers, said he also thought the measure was bad policy.
“From what we’ve seen, this piece of legislation is focused on stopping trade, not facilitating trade,” Shore said. “And it is totally counterproductive to the trade debate.”
The "Trade Act" would require that all future U.S. agreements include more labor and environmental provisions, and it includes a “sense of the Congress” proposal that calls for a replacement to so-called fast-track authority — which gave the Congress only a yes or no vote on trade agreements — by giving Congress a more signiicant say in selecting negotiating partners.
A trade reform bill introduced this week would put the brakes on pending trade agreements and could result in re-opening existing pacts such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Led by Rep. Mike Michaud (D-Maine), chairman of the House Trade Working Group, more than 100 supporters of the legislation claim it sets out a new international trade model that would help protect human rights, the environment and U.S. jobs. The working group has opposed free-trade agreements, including the Central American Free Trade Agreement and the pending pacts.
The proposed legislation would require that pending agreements with Panama, Colombia and South Korea be renegotiated to meet the TRADE Act’s requirements. The bill has the support of several progressive organizations, such as Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, environmental groups and all the major unions, including the AFL-CIO and Change to Win.
“This is the opportunity to build a new model for trade,” said Michaud, noting that a companion bill in the Senate is also in the works.
Business groups and industry lobbyists, however, say the measure would stifle trade and hurt the U.S. economy.
“This is a recipe for disaster,” said Christopher Wenk, trade lobbyist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “These guys want to set a course backward on trade, and we want to set a course forward on trade. This is not the course our workers and exporters need right now.”
Andrew Shore, a partner with the trade law and lobbying firm Jochum Shore & Trossevin, which represents retailers and importers, said he also thought the measure was bad policy.
“From what we’ve seen, this piece of legislation is focused on stopping trade, not facilitating trade,” Shore said. “And it is totally counterproductive to the trade debate.”
The "Trade Act" would require that all future U.S. agreements include more labor and environmental provisions, and it includes a “sense of the Congress” proposal that calls for a replacement to so-called fast-track authority — which gave the Congress only a yes or no vote on trade agreements — by giving Congress a more signiicant say in selecting negotiating partners.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
